The Occupy London movement is directed against the proverbial “one percent” – not against St. Paul’s Cathedral. It is directed against the disproportionate concentration of wealth and power at the expense of the many. Bearing this in mind, here are 7 of the 10 trustees of St Paul’s Cathedral Foundation, the charity organisation which oversees all events and projects to do with the cathedral:
Chairman: Sir John Stuttard – Partner at PriceWaterhouseCoopers; former Lord Mayor of the City of London.
Dame Helen Alexander DBE – Deputy chair of the Confederation of British Industry, one of the largest business lobbying groups in the country
Lord Ian Blair of Boughton – Former Metropolitan Police Commissioner
Roger Gifford – Investment banker
Gavin Ralston – Global Head of Product and leading international asset manager at Schroder Investment Management
Carol Sergeant CBE – Chief Risk Director at Lloyds TSB; formerly Managing Director for Regulatory Process and Risk at the Financial Standards Authority
John Spence OBE – Former Managing Director, Business Banking, LloydsTSB
Nobody suggests that the trustees are gathering for clandestine meetings, like members of a secret brotherhood. But what we can conclude from the above, is just how collusive – how intertwined – the institution of St Paul’s is with the ideology which we are trying to fight. It would be naïve to expect the trustees to offer skills and knowledge to St. Paul’s without being influenced by their experiences and interests. Their biographies, after all, reflect a very particular way of life. St. Paul’s, as an institution, obviously lends great weight to their views and opinions. 
The trustees of St. Paul’s have benefitted enormously from the present state of affairs. Yet they are now dealing with a movement that brings attention to the injustices embedded in that state of affairs and to those who do not benefit from it.
The events of the last few weeks have led to a very interesting dynamic. At the time of writing, two clerical figures have resigned over the church’s decisions. We are witnessing the clash of two visions for the role of the church. According to the first view, St. Paul’s is primarily a tourist attraction and a provider of church services. It is comfortably situated in the centre of the largest concentration of wealth in Britain even in times of economic crisis and hardship. Yet this view now clashes with the self-image of the church as the moral conscience of society.
Until recently, St Paul’s has limited itself to areas of activity where it has never had to confront this contradiction directly. Words sufficed whenever moral questions were put before the church. As recently as last week, Graeme Knowles, the Dean of St Paul’s, wrote in a statement that, “The debate about a more just society is at the heart of much our work at St Paul’s and indeed we hope to contribute to the wider debate in the very near future through a Report from the St Paul’s institute.”
To us, the vague promise of “a Report” seems disappointingly non-committal. Fed up with the inequalities of our society, people have brought themselves out onto the streets to actually manifest change. Our unique situation of Occupy LSX has not only highlighted problems of injustice but has also shone a light on the role of the church as a moral guardian of society.
Many clerics are now faced with a moral dilemma: how will the church (and the individuals that comprise it) deal with a protest movement whose aims converge with certain ideals of the Christian faith? And how will St Paul’s financial interests influence discussions about moral leadership? The resignation of two clergy members indicates the severity of the dilemma that might eventually result in the forcible removal of protesters from the doorsteps of St Paul’s Cathedral.
The City of London is bound up with the Royals, Mass murder, horror, torture, and abuse – and with War for Greed. This is because the Finance sector in the UK, and therefore the City, is ruled astrologically by the Venus complex (in the 1922 UK national horoscope) – and Venus is the archetype (deity) of money and wealth. Called Lucifer. The trouble is, Venus is linked-in to Algol, the most demonic star in the known cosmos, Mars, the archetype of War, and the star Regulus which is to do with the Royals. This means the City is the hub of a demonic Luciferian cult which pursues war and mass murder for profit. It radiates these demonic and violent energies into the subtle realms (or rolled-up dimensions) around it.
St Pauls is of course designed internally to the solar system, as known in the 17th century, with the sun at the centre. It’s a powerful occult instrument of the elite, not simply a church. It was originally conceived as the centrepiece of a new kabbalistic layout for the City, after the Great Fire. Both Wren and a rival produced similar kabbalistic plans. Neither were adopted in full because of the speed with which dwellings needed to be rebuilt, to the old street layout. But we can see the profound esoteric content of the proposals.
So to call St Paul’s Christian is only half the story! It was meant to serve the mighty as a potent hub of occult power. This became much more sinister after 1922, when the City became hitched to the demonic energies and frequencies of the Medusa star, Algol. This is also the reason why Greed and War have become ever more demonic in tandem since 1922, and why civilians became the main target of war. Which they still are – as we’ve seen in Libya.
The dilemma for St Paul’s is whether to remain tied in with the demonic City – or whether to re-emphasise a Christian and esoteric message closer to Jesus’.